Drucken

 

Statistik zum Projekt "CPR 2005 - Evaluation"11 Jan 2006 15:42
[+] Legende
Frage: When did you arrive to Dubrovnik?
(Date of arrival)
  Anzahl Prozent  
Before Sunday, Sept. 18 (1) 9 14.06%
Sunday, Sept. 18 (2) 13 20.31%
Monday, Sept. 19 (3) 11 17.19%
Tuesday, Sep. 20 (4) 21 32.81%
Wednesday, Sep. 21 (5) 5 7.81%
Thursday, Sep. 22 (6) 3 4.69%
Friday, Sep. 23 (7) 1 1.56%
Saturday, Sep. 24 (8) 1 1.56%
GESAMT 64    
ungültig (fehlend) 1    
Mittelwert 3.28    
    N = 67    |    n = 65    |    sys-missing = 2
Frage: When did you depart from Dubrovnik?
(Date of departure)
  Anzahl Prozent  
Tuesday, Sep. 20 (1) 0 0.00%
Wednesday, Sep. 21 (2) 1 1.56%
Thursday, Sep. 22 (3) 6 9.38%
Friday, Sep. 23 (4) 6 9.38%
Saturday, Sep. 24 (5) 8 12.50%
Sunday, Sept. 25 (6) 29 45.31%
Monday, Sept. 26 (7) 3 4.69%
After Monday, Sept. 27 (8) 11 17.19%
GESAMT 64    
ungültig (fehlend) 1    
Mittelwert 5.73    
    N = 67    |    n = 65    |    sys-missing = 2
Frage: Which days did you attend the CPR conference?


Please select all answers that apply.
  Anzahl Prozent  
Tuesday, Sep. 20 - afternoon 41 65.08%
Wednesday, Sep. 21- morning 48 76.19%
Wednesday, Sep. 21 - afternoon 47 74.60%
Thursday, Sep. 22 - morning 40 63.49%
Thursday, Sep. 22 - afternoon 47 74.60%
Friday, Sep. 23 - morning 40 63.49%
Friday, Sep. 23 - afternoon 43 68.25%
Saturday, Sep. 24 - morning 28 44.44%
    N = 67    |    n = 63    |    sys-missing = 4
Frage: In your opinion, the overall length of the conference
(three full and two half days) was:
  Anzahl Prozent  
Too short (1) 0 0.00%
Just right (2) 44 72.13%
Too long (3) 17 27.87%
GESAMT 61    
ungültig (fehlend) 2    
Mittelwert 2.28    
    N = 67    |    n = 63    |    sys-missing = 4
Frage: In thinking about the number of social events offered, would
you say there was:
  Anzahl Prozent  
Too few social events (1) 10 16.13%
Just the right amount of social events (2) 49 79.03%
Too many social events (3) 3 4.84%
GESAMT 62    
ungültig (fehlend) 1    
Mittelwert 1.89    
    N = 67    |    n = 63    |    sys-missing = 4
Frage: Which of the following options best reflects your overall evaluation
about CPR 2005?
  Anzahl Prozent  
Excellent (1) 19 30.65%
Good (2) 37 59.68%
Fair (3) 6 9.68%
Poor (4) 0 0.00%
Very poor (5) 0 0.00%
GESAMT 62    
ungültig (fehlend) 1    
Mittelwert 1.79    
    N = 67    |    n = 63    |    sys-missing = 4
Frage: In thinking about the number of paper/poster sessions offered,
would you say there was:
  Anzahl Prozent  
Too few paper/poster sessions (1) 5 8.33%
Just the right amount of paper/poster sessions (2) 47 78.33%
Too many paper/poster sessions (3) 8 13.33%
GESAMT 60    
ungültig (fehlend) 1    
Mittelwert 2.05    
    N = 67    |    n = 61    |    sys-missing = 6
Frage: There were no simultaneous paper sessions at this conference
because we wanted to give a chance to every paper to be heard.
On the other hand, this might have reduced the amount of time left
for developing social contacts and sightseeing.
What would have been your preference for CPR 2005?
  Anzahl Prozent  
Have multiple paper sessions at the same time (1) 22 37.29%
Have only single-track paper sessions (2) 37 62.71%
GESAMT 59    
ungültig (fehlend) 2    
Mittelwert 1.63    
    N = 67    |    n = 61    |    sys-missing = 6
Frage: Which of the following options do you prefer for the next CPR conference?
  Anzahl Prozent  
same number of papers, concurrent sessions, fewer days (1) 9 15.00%
more papers, concurrent sessions, same number of days (2) 19 31.67%
same number of papers, no concurrent sessions, same number of days (3) 25 41.67%
fewer papers, no concurrent sessions, fewer days (5) 7 11.67%
GESAMT 60    
ungültig (fehlend) 1    
Mittelwert 2.62    
    N = 67    |    n = 61    |    sys-missing = 6
Frage: Did you attend any of the keynote speeches?
  Anzahl Prozent  
Yes (1) 50 81.97%
No (2) 11 18.03%
GESAMT 61    
ungültig (fehlend) 0    
Mittelwert 1.18    
    N = 67    |    n = 61    |    sys-missing = 6
Frage: Which keynote speeche(s) did you attend?


Please check all that apply.
  Anzahl Prozent  
Tuesday - M. Joseph Sirgy - Consumer Self-Concept 39 78.00%
Wednesday - Paul Barret - Consumer Profiling 35 70.00%
Thursday - Denis Bratko - Behavioral Genetics 26 52.00%
Friday - Mick Couper - The Power of the Visible 22 44.00%
Saturday - Bozidar Klicek - Knowledge Discovery 18 36.00%
    N = 67    |    n = 50    |    sys-missing = 17
Frage: How would you evaluate the quality of the invited keynote
speeche(s) you attended?
Excellent (1) Good (2) Fair (3) Poor (4) Very poor (5) Did not attend (6) Gesamt Mittelwert Missing*
A B
M. Joseph Sirgy
Consumer Self-Concept
36.96%
(17)
32.61%
(15)
13.04%
(6)
0.00%
(0)
0.00%
(0)
17.39%
(8)
 
46
2.46
0
4
Paul Barret
Consumer Profilingt
31.11%
(14)
33.33%
(15)
11.11%
(5)
0.00%
(0)
0.00%
(0)
24.44%
(11)
 
45
2.78
0
5
Denis Bratko
Behavioral Geneticst
10.26%
(4)
25.64%
(10)
23.08%
(9)
2.56%
(1)
2.56%
(1)
35.90%
(14)
 
39
3.69
0
11
Mick Couper
The Power of the Visiblet
22.50%
(9)
25.00%
(10)
10.00%
(4)
0.00%
(0)
0.00%
(0)
42.50%
(17)
 
40
3.58
0
10
Bozidar Klicek
Knowledge Discovery
0.00%
(0)
13.89%
(5)
11.11%
(4)
13.89%
(5)
11.11%
(4)
50.00%
(18)
 
36
4.72
0
14
    N = 67    |    n = 50    |    sys-missing = 17* A = n/a B = ungültig (fehlend)
Frage: Did you attend any of the paper sessions?
  Anzahl Prozent  
Yes (1) 59 96.72%
No (2) 2 3.28%
GESAMT 61    
ungültig (fehlend) 0    
Mittelwert 1.03    
    N = 67    |    n = 61    |    sys-missing = 6
Frage: Which paper session(s) did you attend?


Please choose all that apply.
  Anzahl Prozent  
Symbolic Congruence 37 62.71%
Consumer Personality Assessment 49 83.05%
Brand Personality 47 79.66%
Cultural Differences 30 50.85%
Consumer Personality and Motives 38 64.41%
Brand Preference and Loyalty 38 64.41%
Data Collection Methodology 22 37.29%
Advertising Research 26 44.07%
eCommerce 20 33.90%
Data Mining, Segmentation and Modelling 23 38.98%
    N = 67    |    n = 59    |    sys-missing = 8
Frage: How would you evaluate the overall quality of the paper sessions
you attended?
  Anzahl Prozent  
Excellent (1) 7 12.28%
Good (2) 35 61.40%
Fair (3) 15 26.32%
Poor (4) 0 0.00%
Very poor (5) 0 0.00%
Did not attend any (6) 0 0.00%
GESAMT 57    
ungültig (fehlend) 2    
Mittelwert 2.14    
    N = 67    |    n = 59    |    sys-missing = 8
Frage: Did you visit any of the poster sessions?
  Anzahl Prozent  
Yes (1) 53 86.89%
No (2) 8 13.11%
GESAMT 61    
ungültig (fehlend) 0    
Mittelwert 1.13    
    N = 67    |    n = 61    |    sys-missing = 6
Frage: How would you evaluate the overall quality of the poster sessions
you attended:
  Anzahl Prozent  
Excellent (1) 7 13.73%
Good (2) 25 49.02%
Fair (3) 17 33.33%
Poor (4) 2 3.92%
Very Poor (5) 0 0.00%
GESAMT 51    
ungültig (fehlend) 2    
Mittelwert 2.27    
    N = 67    |    n = 53    |    sys-missing = 14
Frage: Here is the list of topics covered at this conference.
In your opinion, which topics should have been treated more deeply?


Please check all that apply.
  Anzahl Prozent  
Symbolic Congruence 15 24.59%
Consumer Personality Assessment 21 34.43%
Brand Personality 23 37.70%
Cultural Differences 11 18.03%
Consumer Personality and Motives 30 49.18%
Brand Preference and Loyalty 18 29.51%
Data Collection Methodology 16 26.23%
Advertising Research 18 29.51%
eCommerce 7 11.48%
Data Mining, Segmentation and Modelling 9 14.75%
    N = 67    |    n = 61    |    sys-missing = 6
Frage: Which topics should have been skipped?


Please check all that apply.
  Anzahl Prozent  
Symbolic Congruence 8 13.11%
Consumer Personality Assessment 2 3.28%
Brand Personality 2 3.28%
Cultural Differences 6 9.84%
Consumer Personality and Motives 3 4.92%
Brand Preference and Loyalty 3 4.92%
Data Collection Methodology 10 16.39%
Advertising Research 6 9.84%
eCommerce 12 19.67%
Data Mining, Segmentation and Modelling 19 31.15%
    N = 67    |    n = 61    |    sys-missing = 6
Frage: Were you an (co-)author of a poster presentation at the conference?
  Anzahl Prozent  
Yes (1) 31 51.67%
No (2) 29 48.33%
GESAMT 60    
ungültig (fehlend) 1    
Mittelwert 1.48    
    N = 67    |    n = 61    |    sys-missing = 6
Frage: Did you present a paper or a poster at the conference?
  Anzahl Prozent  
Yes, paper 36 59.02%
Yes, poster 19 31.15%
No 10 16.39%
    N = 67    |    n = 61    |    sys-missing = 6
Frage: How would you evaluate the organization of the conference in general?
  Anzahl Prozent  
Excellent (1) 42 71.19%
Good (2) 16 27.12%
Fair (3) 1 1.69%
Poor (4) 0 0.00%
Very poor (5) 0 0.00%
GESAMT 59    
ungültig (fehlend) 2    
Mittelwert 1.31    
    N = 67    |    n = 61    |    sys-missing = 6
Frage: How satisfied were you with the ...
Not at all satisfied (1) Somewhat unsatisfied (2) Somewhat satisfied (3) Very satisfied (4) Gesamt Mittelwert Missing*
A B
Conference venue
(the ICCU building)
0.00%
(0)
7.02%
(4)
35.09%
(20)
57.89%
(33)
 
57
3.51
0
4
Reception desk services
1.79%
(1)
1.79%
(1)
16.07%
(9)
80.36%
(45)
 
56
3.75
0
5
Conference room
1.85%
(1)
5.56%
(3)
48.15%
(26)
44.44%
(24)
 
54
3.35
0
7
Refreshments served at coffee breaks
1.79%
(1)
10.71%
(6)
32.14%
(18)
55.36%
(31)
 
56
3.41
0
5
Length of coffee breaks
0.00%
(0)
5.36%
(3)
37.50%
(21)
57.14%
(32)
 
56
3.52
0
5
Lunch/dinner discount option instead of served lunches/dinners.
5.36%
(3)
23.21%
(13)
32.14%
(18)
39.29%
(22)
 
56
3.05
0
5
Your accommodation
0.00%
(0)
10.71%
(6)
28.57%
(16)
60.71%
(34)
 
56
3.50
0
5
Your travel arrangements
7.14%
(4)
10.71%
(6)
33.93%
(19)
48.21%
(27)
 
56
3.23
0
5
    N = 67    |    n = 61    |    sys-missing = 6* A = n/a B = ungültig (fehlend)
Frage: Three social events were offered during the conference.


Please indicate those social events you participated in.
  Anzahl Prozent  
Guided tour through the Old town of Dubrovnik 27 44.26%
Boat trip to the Island of Lokrum 29 47.54%
Bus trip to Cilipi and Cavtat 26 42.62%
None 17 27.87%
    N = 67    |    n = 61    |    sys-missing = 6
Frage: Please evaluate the quality of each of the social events you attended.
Exellent (1) Good (2) Fair (3) Poor (4) Very poor (5) Did not attend (6) Gesamt Mittelwert Missing*
A B
Guided tour through the
Old town of Dubrovnik
42.31%
(11)
38.46%
(10)
15.38%
(4)
3.85%
(1)
0.00%
(0)
0.00%
(0)
 
26
1.81
0
1
Boat trip to the
Island of Lokrum
56.52%
(13)
8.70%
(2)
4.35%
(1)
0.00%
(0)
0.00%
(0)
30.43%
(7)
 
23
2.70
0
4
Bus trip to
Cilipi and Cavtat
23.81%
(5)
23.81%
(5)
9.52%
(2)
14.29%
(3)
9.52%
(2)
19.05%
(4)
 
21
3.19
0
6
    N = 67    |    n = 27    |    sys-missing = 40* A = n/a B = ungültig (fehlend)
Frage: Did you attend the short course on Web-based data collection
on Friday, September 23rd?
  Anzahl Prozent  
Yes (1) 12 19.67%
No (2) 49 80.33%
GESAMT 61    
ungültig (fehlend) 0    
Mittelwert 1.80    
    N = 67    |    n = 61    |    sys-missing = 6
Frage: How useful was this short course for you?
  Anzahl Prozent  
Very useful (1) 8 66.67%
Somewhat useful (2) 3 25.00%
Not useful (3) 1 8.33%
Completely useless (4) 0 0.00%
GESAMT 12    
ungültig (fehlend) 0    
Mittelwert 1.42    
    N = 67    |    n = 12    |    sys-missing = 55
Frage: Did you (or will you) contact Globalpark for further information on their products and services?
  Anzahl Prozent  
Yes (1) 19 32.20%
No (2) 40 67.80%
GESAMT 59    
ungültig (fehlend) 2    
Mittelwert 1.68    
    N = 67    |    n = 61    |    sys-missing = 6
Frage: One explicit goal of CPR 2005 was to deepen and foster scientific exchange and collaboration.


Did you make new promising contacts during CPR 2005?
  Anzahl Prozent  
Yes (1) 35 59.32%
No (2) 10 16.95%
Not sure (3) 14 23.73%
GESAMT 59    
ungültig (fehlend) 2    
Mittelwert 1.64    
    N = 67    |    n = 61    |    sys-missing = 6
Frage: Did you deepen your existing contacts during CPR 2005?
  Anzahl Prozent  
Yes (1) 29 50.00%
No (2) 22 37.93%
Not sure (3) 7 12.07%
GESAMT 58    
ungültig (fehlend) 3    
Mittelwert 1.62    
    N = 67    |    n = 61    |    sys-missing = 6
Frage: In your opinion, should there be a second CPR conference?
  Anzahl Prozent  
Yes (1) 60 98.36%
No (2) 1 1.64%
GESAMT 61    
ungültig (fehlend) 0    
Mittelwert 1.02    
    N = 67    |    n = 61    |    sys-missing = 6
Frage: If CPR is held again, how likely are you to attend and/or submit a paper?
  Anzahl Prozent  
Very likely (1) 35 58.33%
Somewhat likely (2) 19 31.67%
Somewhat unlikely (3) 6 10.00%
Very unlikely (4) 0 0.00%
GESAMT 60    
ungültig (fehlend) 0    
Mittelwert 1.52    
    N = 67    |    n = 60    |    sys-missing = 7